Los Angeles seeks record setting solar power price under 2¢/kWh

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Board of Commissioners was presented with the Eland Solar & Storage Center in Kern County, California, from an LADWP internal team on June 18, 2019.

The team told the commissioners that on July 23, they plan to seek approval of a two phase 25-year power purchase agreement (PPA) priced at 1.997¢/kWh for 400 MWac / 530 MWdc of solar electricity delivered at time of generation plus a adder 1.3¢/kWh for the excess electricity later delivered from a co-located 400 MW / 800 MWh energy storage system.

Per an email from 8minute, the project will be built in two 200 MWac solar phases. There is no price escalator, and the solar portion is a record low price for the United States. It even beats out the current U.S. pricing leader – 8minute’s 2.375¢/kWh from the 300 MW Eagle Shadow Mountain solar project.

The project includes the option to add 50 MW / 200 MWh of energy storage for an additional adder of 0.665¢/kWh. It was suggested that the excess electricity will be used during the evening peak period to ease ramping, though one presenter also brought up that the morning peak was as important to consider (see analysis of this volume at end of article).

The Kern County website holds thousands of pages of development documents – mostly related to environmental analysis – but some describing the installation itself. The project will be built among more than 1 GWac of solar power projects, including others developed by 8minute. The site documents state that there is more than 500 MWac of capacity available within various pieces of land in the Eland development proposal, meaning this site will probably expand with more solar as more PPAs are signed in the future.

The current record solar power price in the world was signed in Mexico at 1.97¢/kWh as part of a batch of projects averaging just over 2¢/kWh. And while there was a lower bid submitted in Saudi Arabia at 1.79¢/kWh, it wasn’t signed.

The LADWP representative noted that there were probably about seven other projects on their short list that they were in advanced negotiations with.

The project is expected to receive Note to Proceed with Construction in later 2022, with first installed capacity able to deliver in April of 2023, and a guaranteed commercial operation date of the last day of 2023. The presenting team noted that the project would represent approximately 5% of the LADWP RPS goal (below image) of 100% clean electricity by 2050.

Using Helioscope (pdf), and data from the Kern County documents, pv magazine USA did a rough simulation of a single 2.0 MW section, with 2.65 MW of modules attached using single axis trackers located at the site. The purpose of doing this was to determine the volume of electricity that could be captured from clipping if a 1 MW / 4 MWh battery was put behind the above layout.

This author does believe that the output will be even greater than is projected here as standard solar modules are modeled, while we expect bifacial on this project.

Note in the image below from the simulation – there will be approximately 2.7% clipping loss over the course of the year equal to ~181 MWh/year (called “Constrained DC Output” in below left chart). A 1 MW / 4 MWh battery that cycles once a day for a year can move 1.4 GWh/year.

Since these units will only be able to cycle once per day with excess solar power, they could also be performing other tasks in periods outside of the charging to discharging period. The presenters noted that the morning electricity ramp needs support as well, so there could be other services that the project delivers to LADWP.


Los Angeles seeks record setting solar power price under 2¢/kWh, by John Weaver, PV Magazine, June 28, 2019.

All images sourced from PV Magazine.

Ventura keeps most electricity accounts with Southern California Edison’s competitor

Driven by a desire to increase renewable power and support the provider they want delivering it, Ventura’s policymakers are keeping the majority of the city’s electricity accounts with the Clean Power Alliance.

Several other cities involved in the joint powers authority are moving around accounts or weighing options in response to significant rate increases set by CPA’s board on June 6 as it closed a gap in projected revenue.

The rate hikes affected 1,800 high-user accounts, about 1% of all customers. Those commercial users face hikes of between 37% and 47% on accounts related to street and highway lighting, outdoor area lighting, pumping and agriculture.

CPA’s residential customers weren’t impacted by the new rates  – they’ll continue to pay based on the tier set by the elected officials of the jurisdictions in which they live.

But for Ventura government and other large accounts, the costs amounted to between tens and hundreds of thousands extra per year.

To bring those down, the Ventura City Council voted 4-3 on Monday night to move its biggest accounts – those related to street lights – to Southern California Edison. Other accounts impacted, including ones related to pumping and large facilities like City Hall, will remain with Clean Power Alliance but move to a 36% renewable energy, down from the 100% mix elected officials previously had chosen.

Read more

Ventura County cities plan return to Southern California Edison for some energy accounts

Cities across Ventura County are moving some energy accounts back to Southern California Edison, the investor-owned utility they left in pursuit of greener power.

The change is to avoid paying higher energy rates, which for many agencies amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars more in annual bills were they to remain with Clean Power Alliance. The joint powers authority formed in 2017 with the goal of procuring renewable energy at a lower cost, giving traditional power companies competition and stimulating the local and regional economy through capital investments.

The counties of Los Angeles and Ventura and 30 cities within them comprise the Clean Power Alliance, started with a $10 million loan from Los Angeles County (the repayment date was recently pushed to Sept. 30, 2020, the second such extension).

It has grown to be the state’s largest community choice aggregation program, and it’s experiencing some growing pains, which officials say are due to several factors, some outside their control.

Read more

California Utility Launches New Program To Help EV Buyers Compare Total Cost Of Ownership

Southern California Edison is ramping up its efforts to support electric vehicle buyers with the introduction of a new tool called SCE Cars that helps estimate the total cost of ownership in its jurisdiction.

The new tool aspires to give potential buyers visibility into the total cost of ownership (TCO) of electric vehicles that looks beyond the initial purchase price. Today, electric vehicles can have higher upfront costs compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, but they have a lower fuel cost per mile and lower maintenance expenses that offset this over the life of the vehicle. The new tool will present the full picture of this cost to prospective buyers (as well as possible) alongside relevant federal, state, utility, air district, and any other rebates that help defray the upfront purchase price.

“There’s never been a better time to consider the benefits of driving an EV. They are becoming more economical and there are more models and options to choose from, and more models are coming,” said Katie Sloan, SCE’s director of eMobility. “On top of that, Southern California has the worst air quality in the nation. Transportation accounts for nearly half of California’s greenhouse gas emissions and more than 80% of its smog-forming emissions. Everyone benefits when someone makes the switch to an EV.”

The SCE Cars tool currently lets shoppers compare the TCO for all makes and models of 2018 and 2019 battery electric, hybrid, and combustion vehicles side by side. To simplify matters, the tool gives each car a rating from 0–100 based on its overall fuel cost and emissions. The higher the score, the better for the driver’s pocketbook and for everyone’s health.

Drivers can even enter their specific driving habits and the cost of fuel to help them compare the cost of fueling up on petrol compared to the integrated cost of electricity based on their specific SCE rate plan.

The lower maintenance expenses that come as part of the electric vehicle ownership experience are often overlooked on even the financial side, but the benefits extend far beyond that. Not having to change the oil is four fewer appointments on the calendar. It’s four fewer times the driver has to sit around waiting for the oil to be changed, four fewer times you have to be hassled about additional fees or services that you may or may not actually need.

SCE Cars is just one piece of a much broader push by this Southern California utility to help its customers switch to driving electric, and it’s helpful. Customers trust SCE and hearing helpful information that is relevant to their very real search for a new type of vehicle can help them to trust the good information they are reading about an electric vehicle. SCE also offers a unique $1,000 rebate to not only the original buyer, but also the second and third buyer of the same electric vehicle to encourage more people to go electric.


California Utility Launches New Program To Help EV Buyers Compare Total Cost Of Ownership, by Kyle Field, Clean Technica, June 13, 2019.

Advocates Push for Clean, City Run Energy Program in San Clemente

Renewable energy advocates are urging South Orange County cities to consider implementing a Community Choice Energy program (CCE) to bring cleaner, more affordable energy to local residents and businesses, while giving cities local purchasing power for electricity.

So far, more than 160 cities and 19 counties across California have formed their own CCEs, a nonprofit program that allows a city, county, municipality or any combination of those entities to aggregate residents’ buying power and purchase energy on their behalf.

However, local advocates of South Orange County Community Choice Alliance (SOCCCA) say Orange County has been slow to the take on the initiative, compared to the rest of the state.

“Orange County has been behind other counties and cities in California to pursue community choice energy,” said Selene Lawrence, a San Clemente resident who is director of government affairs at Sullivan Solar Power and a SOCCCA advocate. “While Northern California was an early leader, adopting Community Choice Energy over a decade ago, Central California, Los Angeles and San Diego regions are pursuing the same benefits by implementing programs as well.”

Solana Beach was one of the first cities in Southern California to develop a fully operational CCE, which it did in June 2018.

The city of San Diego hopes to have its CCE program operational by 2021, with goals of lowering energy rates for residents and running on 100% renewable energy by the year 2035, 10 years earlier than the state requires.

The coastal cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas and Del Mar have banded together and are reviewing a potential program. Los Angeles County just launched “L.A. Clean Power Alliance,” a county-wide CCE program that cities can opt into, and San Diego County is also looking into it.

Local resident Tyler Boden, a SOCCCA advocate and Sullivan Solar Power project developer, said there was talk among San Clemente City Council members last year about implementing the program into the city’s climate action plan. In November 2018, councilmembers unanimously voted to proceed in investigating a CCE, but he said not much has been done since then.

SOCCCA is asking the cities of San Clemente, Dana Point and San Juan Capistrano to consider the CCE program that they say could ultimately save residents a minimum of 2% on their energy bills.

Right now, San Clemente residents get one electric bill in the mail, and it’s from San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), which has monopoly in San Diego and South Orange County.

A bill passed in 2002, Assembly Bill 117, made CCEs a viable option for California cities that wanted to take back the buying power from investor-owned utilities and be able to purchase electricity for their own residents.

Meanwhile, residents have a choice over their utility company and can opt out of a CCE at any time.

As for the benefits of a CCE, the advocacy group SOCCCA is saying there are many.

“CCEs are more incentivized to buy clean energy,” said Lawrence. “It allows cities to meet their own climate action plan goals while lowering rates for residents and businesses, as well as lessening local pollution and reducing the city’s carbon footprints.”

Another reason, she said, is CCEs are nonprofit entities, whereas SDG&E is investor-owned and has to tack on a profit margin to its energy bills. “A city isn’t beholden to shareholders like SDG&E is, so cities with CCE programs can offer lower rates and create programs that reinvest and benefit the community.”

Community Choice Energy is a partnership between a city or cities and a utility. Cities can then form a joint powers authority (JPA) to purchase the power supply at a negotiated rate, while the utility company continues to deliver electricity over the power lines and handle billing.

Boden said CCEs allow cities to choose where their energy comes from, and investing in renewable energy ultimately pays for itself.

“If we engage into a long-term contract for renewables, those would pay for themselves over a period of time, and once it’s paid for, it will continue to generate power. So, in the longer term, it allows for a region to be completely self-reliant on its power. It’s not only generating more power at a lower cost to residents, but it also allows for resiliency,” said Boden.

Resiliency would translate as a benefit in the extreme case that a catastrophe or blackout occurred, he said.

“Theoretically, South Orange County could be resilient, generating and storing its own power on a micro grid,” Boden said.

In addition, surplus profits that would otherwise go to shareholders could instead be invested into programs that are tailored to the local community, advocates say.

The local advocates say San Clemente’s first step would be to conduct a feasibility study. At a price range of $60,000 to $100,000, the study would determine potential savings for residents and provide an estimate on start-up costs for the implementation of the program.

To keep costs down, Boden said the three cities could do a shared study. In March, SOCCCA held a workshop attended by several local councilmembers from the three cities.

“Our effort has been to try to advocate to our city staff and city council electives in each of the cities to try to talk to each other and come together to do a shared study,” said Boden.

Advocates are hoping San Clemente will move forward in an effort they see as a win-win.

“All of these CCEs are saying this program is so beneficial. It’s low risk. It has so many benefits for the community,” said Lawrence. “It’s changing the way that we can meet our own climate goals, city and state-wide. It’s such an important step if we really are serious about moving toward 100% clean energy, which we need to do.”


Advocates Push for Clean, City Run Energy Program in San Clemente, by Cari Hachmann, San Clemente Times, June 6, 2019.

Clean Power Alliance: Strategic Plan Launches

Clean Power Alliance is launching its Local Programs Strategic Plan process with an inaugural workshop in Downtown Los Angeles. 80-100 community stakeholders across Los Angeles County are expected to come participate in an interactive workshop focused on energy and electrification measures. A second Ventura County based workshop in July and a tri-lingual online survey are also planned.

The innovative new electricity provider for 31 cities across Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, which launched in 2018 already has demonstrated a strong commitment to renewable energy and local control. Clean Power Alliance’s vision of a clean energy future also translates to developing future programs for the community now that the enrollment of approximately 1 million customers is nearly complete.

Following the trend of other statewide customer choice aggregation (CCA) utilities’ practice of reinvesting money back into customer programs, Clean Power Alliance has initiated a process to guide its future programmatic investments. The strategic plan will guide the next five years (2020-2025) of investment and include a six-month stakeholder engagement process and rigorous study of existing CCA and utility programs. Other CCAs have initiated customer programs that promote electrification of transportation and buildings, low-income solar incentives, and new rates that help promote conservation.

The intended outcome will be a transparent decision-making process and comparative tool for how to prioritize future programs that could save customers money while achieving community goals such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting climate resiliency, reaching underserved communities/customers, and creating jobs. Those interested in attending may RSVP here.


WHENTuesday, June 18th, 2019, 1-3PM

WHERE: Ground Floor Auditorium, 555 W. 5th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013

PARKING: Street parking is available for media at Pershing Square directly across the street.


Clean Power Alliance: Strategic Plan Launches, by Aaron Huelsman, The South Pasadenan, June 6, 2019.

Peninsula Center Library to be powered by 100% clean energy in 2020

The Peninsula Center Library, in Rolling Hills Estates, will be powered by 100% renewable energy in 2020, increasing its reliance on the Clean Power Alliance energy provider.

The Palos Verdes Library District announced the decision to increase its current 50% tier in a statement late last month.

The special district, which operates the library as well as the Malaga Cove and Miraleste libraries on the hill, decided to take the step in a decade-long move toward sustainability, according to Facilities Manager Charles Crouse.

“Purchasing clean power is the frosting on the cake of everything else we’ve done as far as sustainability here at the library,” Crouse said.

The district, he explained, has also replaced equipment to make air conditioning more efficient, switched out computer monitors, installed light timers and LED light bulbs, which has reduced power consumption at the center by 32% since 2016.

“We’ve been consistently trying to save energy,” Crouse added. “Now we will be able to tell our participants and tax payers we’re on totally clean power.”

Read more

Solar energy company says solar, batteries can replace LADWP’s gas power plants

When Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti announced back in February that LADWP would phase out three natural gas power plants located along the coast over the next decade, customers started asking how the utility company would make up for that lost power.

The three power plants represent 38% of the city’s current natural gas portfolio. The residential solar power provider Sunrun thinks they have a solution.

According to analysis by Sunrun, 75,000 L.A. homes and apartment buildings with solar panels and their brightbox battery would equal the energy produced by one of the natural gas plants.

“Recently, we have seen the cost of this technology come down. The way we have built our electricity system, which is a very centralized infrastructure because that’s the technology we had decades ago, can now take on this much more distributed architecture where customers can play a role. We don’t need to rely on centralized power plants. Nobody wants a big power plant in their backyard. There’s a lot of equity issues and environmental issues here,” said Audrey Lee, the vice president of Sunrun Energy Services.

LADWP customer Tony Roberts recently had solar panels installed on the roof of his Van Nuys home. He says it’s not just better for the environment, but it will save him a lot of money.

“Beyond the initial capital investment in my solar panels, there will be a return on investment. That’s what I looked at when I installed this system. Over time, over a 10-year period, once this system is paid off, my power bill which i paid $180 for, will go away. Then, I will have a $12.00 a month inter connect fee with the DWP,” said Roberts.

“We used to be a majority coal and gas, now we’re just 50% coal and gas and soon will be 100% renewable. That’s going to be solar, wind hydropower so we have to replace that with what we have, the sunshine,” said Garcetti.

A 1,700 square foot home in San Fernando has hired Sunrun to install 27 solar panels. The installation will take one day. When it’s complete, LADWP will come and turn the system, and this home will have 100% of its energy offset by clean solar.

L.A. has a goal of 100% renewable energy by 2050. Homes serving as a virtual power plant could be the solution. A home with Sunrun’s brightbox battery stores the energy produced by solar panels. Energy stored in the battery can be used to provide backup power to the home or to supply power to other customers.

“The $4 billion that we will save by not re-powering these gas plants, we can put into solar. Subsidies for homes. Subsidies for businesses. Each one of us can become a power producer, not just a power consumer,” said Garcetti.


Solar energy company says solar, batteries can replace LADWP’s gas power plants, by Josh Haskell, ABC 7 Los Angeles, June 3, 2019.

Ventura: Take the Lead, Going Green with Electric Vehicles

There is a global climate change crisis. No question. And Ventura County is near ground zero in that crisis.

Take a look. We’re experiencing the worst of drought, fires, and water shortages. The projections of sea level rise that will impact our coastline are alarming. These local impacts have the fingerprints of climate change all over them. Additionally, the County suffers from unhealthy levels of ozone air pollution. Addressing these impacts make reducing greenhouse gas emissions critical, and we believe that the County can and should do something to fight back.

The County until recently was designated as a “severe drought” area, and changes to rainfall patterns have left the County with serious water shortage and fire hazard crises. This past summer, temperatures reached record highs and serious damage to agricultural crops resulted. The Thomas, Hill, and Woolsey fires together burned more than 380,000 acres and destroyed more than 2,700 structures. A CalFire division chief working the Carr fire last summer said “It is clear to me that firefighters are on the front lines of climate change.”

The California Coastal Commission estimates, in its medium scenario prediction, that the local sea level could rise 1.9 feet by 2050 and 6.8 feet by the end of the century. For a county with 47 miles of coastline, that degree of sea level rise would be devastating.

Yes, climate change is real, but there are solutions at hand to start to both reverse the warming trend and at the same time reduce air pollution. Remember the motto: Think globally. Act locally. While climate change is a global problem, Ventura County needs to do its share to solve the problem. The County of Ventura has started replacing some its gas vehicles with electric vehicles. Now it’s time for the County to act locally and consider adopting an electric vehicle program for all of its fleet that will help reduce both global carbon dioxide emissions and ozone air pollution here in the County.

The production and combustion of fossil fuels is the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions. There are many ways fuels are used in our everyday lives — cooking on a gas stove, heating water and buildings, generating electricity, and propelling our motor vehicles. The result of producing and using fossil fuels for combustion is the creation of greenhouse gases (GHGs), primarily carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), as well as ozone air pollution precursors. These gases, and a few others, trap heat in the atmosphere and cause the earth to warm up. Fuel combustion emissions also increase air pollution levels. The largest source of GHGs and ozone precursors are motor vehicles. We want to focus on reducing emissions from light duty vehicle fleets.

The largest vehicle fleet in Ventura County is operated by the County of Ventura, followed by the 10 cities, the many school and special districts, and major companies. We believe the County can and should lead the way to converting its large fleet of light duty vehicles to EV’s as they are replaced on their normal replacement schedule. Adding more charging stations is another important action to make the operation of electric vehicles more convenient and efficient.

A 2019 Northwestern University study shows that electric vehicles charged from the grid, which is a mix of renewable and fossil fueled power plants, are still cleaner than using gasoline powered cars. Electric vehicles charged from 100 percent renewable sources of electricity have zero direct greenhouse gas emissions.

The Board of Supervisors has already taken major steps to address climate change, such as the large solar electric array at the parking lot at the County Government Center. The most recent climate action the board (and a number of cities) took is the creation of the Clean Power Alliance, which connects Ventura County electrical consumers to renewable energy sources.

The next important step the Board of Supervisors can and should take is to convert the County fleet from gasoline and diesel to electric power, and set an example to the other cities, districts, businesses, and residents in the County to do the same.

As two Ventura County professionals with over 80 years of environmental and air quality experience between us, we strongly recommend that the County Supervisors take action now.  Doing so would reduce local ozone air pollution levels and would demonstrate that Ventura County takes global warming and climate change very seriously, and is prepared to fight back.


Richard H. Baldwin, Ventura County Air Pollution Control Officer 1982-2002; Phil White, County Planning Commissioner – District 1, and former Ventura County APCD Director in the 1970s. 


Take the Lead, Going Green with Electric Vehicles, by Richard H. Baldwin and Phil White, VC Reporter, May 23, 2019.

Manhattan Beach will switch to 100 percent clean power for city facilities

All Manhattan Beach city facilities will be powered by 100 percent green energy starting next month.

At a council meeting this week, local leaders voted to increase the city’s elected power tier with the Clean Power Alliance from 50 percent to 100 percent renewable energy.

“It’s not an understatement to say this would be the biggest environmental decision that has ever been made in the city,” said Environmental Sustainability Manager Dana Murray.

The move will cost between $70,000 to $90,000, according to Murray, but those funds will not come from an increase in tax dollars.

She said the cost will be balanced in the city’s budget and offset by energy efficiency projects such as LED light conversions in public spaces.

“General estimates is that by going up to 100 percent renewable energy, the costs are about 7 to 9 percent more,” Murray explained.

Read more